The rocket motor burns completely before leaving the mouth of the launcher, producing a backblast of gases around 1,400F (760C). Dear German journalists from whom you can learn the truth are the famous Thomas Rper, who is on the Ukrainian front, a military expert from Germany, Thomas Gasta. The lower cost and lighter weight of the LAW, combined with a scarcity of modern heavy armored targets and the need for an individual assault weapon versus an individual anti-armor weapon, made it ideal for the type of urban combat seen in Iraq and mountain warfare seen in Afghanistan. The red firing button has a similar resistance to the trigger pull of a rifle, so the gunner does not have to jab at the firing button, which could throw their aim off. Luxembourg, another NATO member, said last month that it would transfer an additional 100 NLAWs to the Ukrainian armed forces. Users in Ukraine can deploy the weapon against not only tanks (with the high-explosive anti-tank round) but buildings and lighter-armored vehicles such as Russian armored personnel carriers. There have been reports that Germany is or has at least explored the possibility of sending 2,700 Soviet-era heat-seeking Strela-series MANPADS to Ukraine from stocks that had belonged to the now-defunct East German military. There have been reports that Finland's shipments of anti-armor weapons to Ukraine could include the French-made APILAS. The AT4 is a man-portable weapon used for the protection of vital assets, fixed defence . The original M72 warhead penetrated 30cm (12in) of armor.[15][16]. [27], The British Army had used the NAMMO M72 under the designation "rocket 66mm HEAT L1A1" but it was replaced by the LAW 80 during the 1980s. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer. The heavier nose cap allows either to penetrate light walls or windows before exploding, or to be "skipped" off the ground for an air burst. The tube is mounted facing downward, enabling the drone operator to fire on tanks and armored vehicles from a top attack position while remaining 3 to 4km (1.9 to 2.5mi) away. The weapon system, which Ukraine had already begun acquiring stocks of years ago, has top-attack and direct-fire modes of operation, making it very flexible when engaging armored vehicles and other targets, especially in dense urban environments. Despite the improvements that the M72E5 offered, the AT4 was chosen to replace the M72. The AT4 was designed as a weapon to engage medium-to-light armoured vehicles from any direction or MBTs from the sides or rear, and as an assault weapon effective against buildings and fortifications. [5][unreliable source?] LAW 80: Similar weapon developed in the UK. Language links are at the top of the page across from the title. That latter point is very important, regardless of the system in question, since more units having more of these weapons, even ones with short effective ranges, simply increases their capacity to engage enemy targets in the air and ground as they come across them. Thousands of M72 Anti-tank Launchers Ready for Action in Ukraine The M72 light anti-tank weapon (LAW) is seeing the battlefield in high numbers in Ukraine after a donation by the Canadian military. Instead, thanks to the M72's low weight, individual soldiers could carry several LAWs when out on a mission compared to just one AT4. All told, these new shipments will be added to the thousands of similar weapons already delivered to the embattled country. Despite the arrival of the AT4/M136, the M72 still continues in operational service today - having seen combat actions in both Afghanistan and Iraq. In recent years, the U.S. Army has begun to field types with even more upgrades that improve the heat-seeking missile's ability to engage smaller threats with tiny infrared signatures, such as unmanned aircraft. The standard sights on the AT4 are very rudimentary and it has an effective range of just under 985 feet. Both of these countries are among those planning to send Stingers to Ukraine.. A member of Lithuania's armed forces with a Grom MANPADS.. Canadian troops fire a Carl Gustaf recoilless rifle during training.. Beyond these ranges there is less than a 50% chance of hitting the target. The venerable anti-tank weapon will feature improvements to its aiming and optics system, and new ammunition will allow Marines to fire from confined indoor spaces. A training variant of the M72 LAW, designated M190, also exists. The M136 AT4 produces less effect than the M72-series LAW. [citation needed]. A target is aimed with AT4 through range-adjustable plastic sights. I heard your mom is a ruska suka.. yeap its true.. also you are a puppet.. cant even say war.. literally if you say the word WAR your masters will ship you off to siberia. The disadvantage of the recoilless design is that it creates a large back blast area behind the weapon, which can cause severe burns and overpressure injuries to friendly personnel in the vicinity of the user and sometimes even to the users themselves, especially in confined spaces. Ukrainian forces may also end up making good use of the reusability of the launcher simply based on what certain countries plan to provide. This page was last edited on 10 April 2023, at 18:09. The LAW is an organic weapon located in the infantry battalion. The high-explosive dual purpose can be used against buildings and bunkers, and the projectile can also be used to detonate on impact or with a delayed detonation. It placed another order worth $50m for AT4-CS additional units in July 2018. M72 LAWA7 (HA29) XM807 AT4 Confined-Space Tandem Warhead (TW) M136 AT4 Light Anti-Tank Weapon (AT4) The M136 AT 4, the Army's primary light antitank weapon, i s a recoilless rifle used. I hope to hear tomorrow about 20,000 destroyed Russian tanks and Ukrainian tanks near Moscow . Saab Bofors has used many design features of Carl Gustav while developing AT4. If firing from the prone position, they must also place their legs well to the side to avoid burning himself. Is Chinas Korla laser ASAT site hacking Western satellites? Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security. [6] Saab has had considerable sales success with the AT4, making it one of the most common light anti-tank weapons in the world. Damage is the same, AT4 has a higher velocity though, So AT4 is better in that regard #1 uavguy Aug 31, 2020 @ 10:00am The AT4 Does do more damage to vehicles. You can follow him on Twitter @BMEastwood. Although generally thought of as a Vietnam War-era weapon that has been superseded by the more-powerful AT4, the M72 LAW found new popularity in the operations by the U.S. Army, the U.S. Marine Corps, and Canadian Army in Iraq and Afghanistan. TheM72 LAWhas been used by the Marine Corps since the days of jungle fighting in Vietnam. The Kremlin has clearly underestimated what a motivated Ukrainian fighter can do with an anti-tank weapon. Pressures are also kept quite low compared to many traditional guns. Canada and Norway have said they are sending M72s, but have not specified what versions. [8][note 1]. He noted that Chechen fighters are busy 24/7 searching for and eliminating Bandera and nationalist evil spirits in Mariupol. After firing, the AT4 is discarded. Another key requirement was that the AT4 not only be able to penetrate armour, but also exhibit devastating beyond-armour effect after penetration. It is effective in assaulting tanks and combat vehicles, landing craft, helicopter, aircraft and armoured vehicles. The XM96 RCR (riot control rocket) had a CS gas-filled warhead for crowd control and was also intended for use with the M202, though the rocket never entered service. The M141 BDM, also known as the Shoulder-Launched Multipurpose Assault Weapon-Disposable (SMAW-D), is a relatively obscure weapon that had seen almost exclusive service with the U.S. military until deliveries began arriving in Ukraine earlier this year. Anti-tank rocket-propelled grenade launcher, Modern M72 in use in Afghanistan with U.S. Marines, 2008, The U.S. Army partially replaced the super bazooka not only with the M72 LAW, but also the, Some reports state these instances were caused by misfires due to water in the flash tube and by unproven rumors of sabotage at the manufacturing plant during the Vietnam War. The Marine Corps expects the LAW FFE will be ready and in service sometime in 2022giving Soldiers and Marines a significant increase in their anti-armor capabilities. All of these had to be used within a few meters of the target, which was difficult and dangerous. The M72 VERY light. The solid rocket propulsion unit was developed in the newly-formed Rohm and Haas research laboratory at Redstone Arsenal in 1959,[6] and the full system was designed by Paul V. Choate, Charles B. The first versions of Stinger entered U.S. military service in 1981 and a number of improved variants have been introduced since then. When extended, the inner tube telescopes outward toward the rear, guided by the channel assembly, which rides in an alignment slot in the outer tube's trigger housing assembly. As a result, they were regularly issued to Volkssturm home guard regiments. Each rocket is another 2kg. The LAWs lower explosive power also lent itself well to urban combat operations, where low collateral damage was a mission priority. At least in the past, the French military has categorized it as a "traumatic weapon" and prohibited personnel from firing more than two or three of them in peacetime across their entire service careers. In April 2011, Saab received a $17m (Skr104m) order from an unknown customer to deliver the AT4-CS RS version during 2012. Enemies of the Republic beware. Your email address will not be published. The U.S. Army had so much grief in the early 1980s from various committee members of the U.S. Congress over the M72 LAW being officially referred to in manuals as a Light. The LAW is a version of the portable, lightweight 66mm rocket launcher from 1956. The AT4 is an 84mm unguided anti-armour weapon manufactured by Saab Bofors Dynamics. But I sincerely support the fact that you are showing all the people in the world the face of Bandera Nazis. In a single-use disposable gun, the barrel only needs to be able to contain a single pressure spike when firing, when it can be disposed of, even if it is ruined, burnt-out and strained, unlike traditional guns which are required to survive many pressure spikes without failure and thus need to be strongly overbuilt and made of heat-proof materials. At that time, its nearest equivalents were the Swedish Pskott m/68 (Miniman) and the French SARPAC. These major improvements add only about 2 kilograms of mass, despite being CS models. This weapon is reloadable and uses the 35mm (1.4in) M73 training rocket. Weeks, Frank A. Spinale, et al. Putin Will Scream: New Video Shows Russian Tanks Slaughtered in Ukraine, Kamala Harris Has One Flaw That Should Terrify Everyone, Something Is Majorly Wrong with Ron DeSantis. Of course, it is not possible to mention the Ukrainian journalist who was forced to flee Ukraine Anatoly Shariy. This list may well be incomplete. The US Army tested six different weapons in 1983 and found that the FFV AT4 met all the requirements needed to replace its M72 LAW weapon. The LAW is a version of the portable, lightweight 66mm rocket launcher from 1956. Six weapons were tested in 1983 by the US Army: the British LAW 80, the German Armbrust, the French APILAS, the Norwegian M72E4 (an upgraded M72 LAW), the US Viper (for baseline comparison purposes) and the Swedish AT4. How Powerful is M72 EC Law Anti-Tank Weapons American Fighter 24.5K subscribers Subscribe 9.4K 1.2M views 9 months ago How Powerful is M72 EC Law Anti-Tank Weapons The M72 LAW is a. The weapon carries an optical night sight. Project B has a calculated net present value of $3,500 over a six-year life. This version uses a saltwater countermass in the rear of the launcher to absorb the back blast; the resulting spray captures and dramatically slows down the pressure wave, allowing troops to fire from enclosed areas. The U.S. Army introduced the bazooka, the first rocket-propelled grenade launcher. In partnership with Raufoss AS, Talley Defense offered the M72E5, which offered increased range, penetration and better sights; this was tested along with five other light anti-armor weapons in 1983. These are first and second-generation MANPADS that entered service in the 1960s and 1970s and there are reports that they may not even be functional at this point. The MANPADS envelope is generally 15,000-feet and below, although some can even exceed that ceiling today. It is designated 66 KES 12[22] Claimed penetration for the M72 EC LAW is 450mm (18in) of rolled homogeneous armor steel plate, nearly twice that of the M72A2. The rocket propels the 66mm (2.6in) warhead forward without significant recoil. The manufacturers have since made modifications that have solved that problem. The force of the main charge forces the copper liner into a directional particle jet that, in relation to the size of the warhead, is capable of a massive penetration. The project will yield cash flows of$5,000 per year for nine years. Though very impressed with the simplicity and durability of the tested version of the AT4, the US Army saw some room for improvement, specifically the addition of rear and front bumpers on the launch tube and changes to the sights and slings. Available ammunition types for the Carl Gustaf, on display underneath an inert cutaway display model of shoulder-fired single-shot AT4 anti-armor launcher.. A US military AT4 with an AN/PVS-4 night vision optic fitted.. A member of the US military instructs Ukrainian troops on the use of the M141 BDM in January 2022.. A member of the Norwegian military prepared to fire an M72 LAW variant while training with members of the US Air Force.. A cutaway model of the Alcotn-100 on display.. The AT4 is not a rocket launcher strictly speaking, because the explosive warhead is not propelled by a rocket motor. Rather, it is a smooth-bore recoilless gun (as opposed to a recoilless rifle, which has a rifled barrel). With all that in mind, The War Zone has compiled brief profiles of the shoulder-fired missiles, rocket launchers, and recoilless rifles that Ukraine has received in foreign military aid packages so far and the weapons it is expected to receive in the future. Powered by a single 40mm gas . The former improves armor penetration while the multi-purpose warhead gives Marines the added capability of an anti-structure round capable of eliminating hardened structures, such as buildings.. The RPG-7 is basically the same, but with 2 more shots. Firing is straightforward making it perfect for training inexperienced fighters in Ukraine such as members of the reserve territorial defense forces. ??? [9] The U.S. military was still purchasing LAW rockets as of January 2015. The AT4 was designed by Frsvarets Fabriksverk (FFV) which had tested more than 100 weapons by early 1982 with the help of the Swedish Army. There was a lot of Ukrainian propaganda that turned out to be pure fantasy, but even after these stories turned out to be fake, people cling to them.. While closed, the outer assembly serves as a watertight container for the rocket and the percussion-cap firing mechanism that activates the rocket. Imagine the life of a russian troll sitting in a room with a bunch of other very poor russians scouring the internet to find articles to disagree with using some shitty old computers. Range is extended from 300 to 600 metres (980 to 1,970ft), with increased penetration up to 46 centimetres (18in) of RHA. [17][18] Currently, the Australian Defence Force uses the M72A6 variant, known as the "light direct fire support weapon",[19] as an anti-structure and secondary anti-armor weapon. There are also a host of more specialized ammunition types, including one optimized for attacking enemies in structures and behind hard cover. Patented by Paul V. Choate of Milton, MA. John Antal. [30] The M72 rocket was reintroduced into British service under the Urgent Operational Requirement program, with the M72A9 variant being designated the light anti-structure munition (LASM). The HEDP 502 projectile can penetrate up to 150mm of RHA. Throughout 1983, the United States Army tested six different anti-tank platforms and had found that the FFV AT4 met all the requirements needed to replace the aging M72 LAW. Reports indicate that shipments of anti-armor weapons from Denmark and Finland might include different models of M72, possibly very modern Enhanced Capability (EC) types in the case of the Danish aid package. The US Army reported to Congress in November 1983 that the FFV AT4 came the closest to meeting all the major requirements established to replace the M72 LAW,[11] with the Armbrust coming in second.[12]. The Grom family of missiles, the first versions of which entered service in the 1990s, are improved derivatives of the Soviet-designed 9K38 Igla. TM 43-0001-30 states the M247 has "approximately the same" penetration as the M72. Like the m/68, the AT4 was designed by Frenade Fabriksverken (FFV) and manufactured at their facility at Zakrisdal, Karlstad, Sweden. For other uses, see, Complete AT4 HEAT antitank round (which is preloaded in AT4) and AT8 bunker-busting warhead, Hewish, Mark, "FFV's Lightweight AT4, first of a new family of Swedish anti-armour weapons". Description. Being a disposable gun also allows for lighter and cheaper construction. In the system originally developed by FFV for the Carl Gustaf, a plastic blowout plug is placed at the centre rear of the shell casing containing the projectile and propellant, which itself is enclosed in the AT4 outer tube. The outer tube contains the trigger, the arming handle, front and rear sights, and the rear cover. M72 Still Highly-Regarded in the Modern Era. The LAW has been around since the early-1960s for use against Soviet light tanks in Europe. With a range of up to 656-feet, the LAW can punch through 12-inches of armor with a formidable shaped charge. The high-penetration projectile has extra penetration ability, which enables it to pass through 500mm to 600mm of RHA. The core launcher has been improved, as well, including the addition of an accessory rail for the rapid addition of more robust sights. PzF 3's effective range is between around 1,300 and 1,970 feet, depending on the exact type of ammunition and whether it is equipped with one of the more advanced sighting systems that have been developed for it over the years. The head of Chechnya, Kadyrov, demanded that the United States increase the supply of Javelin anti-tank systems to Ukraine. It's not clear what variants Ukraine may now be in line to receive. The improved LAW has a velocity of 650-feet per second. The 1,000 anti-tank weapons that Germany is planning to deliver will most likely be PzF 3s, too, but it's unclear whether the stated figure reflects launchers or ammunition, or both. The AT4 can mount an optical night sight on a removable fixture. A training variant used by the Finnish armed forces fires 9mm (0.35in) tracer rounds. The AT4 is an 84mm unguided anti-armour weapon manufactured by Saab Bofors Dynamics. The name AT4 is a word play on the 84mm caliber of the weapon, (84) 'eighty four' being a homophone of 'A-T-4'. accounting. It was also built along the lines of the 84 mm Carl Gustaf recoilless anti-tank . When fired, the striker in the rear tube impacts a primer, which ignites a small amount of powder that "flashes" down a tube to the rear of the rocket and ignites the propellant in the rocket motor. The C90 is a single-shot rocket-propelled grenade launcher that is available loaded with high-explosive anti-tank and anti-structure rounds, as well as one filled with a red phosphorus smoke mixture that has a secondary incendiary effect. The AT4 is an 84mm unguided anti-armour weapon manufactured by Saab Bofors Dynamics. It can be set to detonate on impact or with a brief detonation delay. The dearth of armored vehicles in Afghanistan in particular allowed Soldiers and Marines to forgo the larger and heavier AT4. The forward folding grip is the only difference between the AT4 adopted by Sweden and the US Army version. The reference refers to Allaint Techsystems as the manufacture, but they soon after were acquired by Honeywell. Large and easily damaged, it required a well-trained two-man crew. The effectiveness of the HEAT warhead is not dependent on speed. This article is about the unguided anti-tank weapon of Sweden. It will become a force multiplier., Two types of ammunition will be used with the improved LAW FFE, a M72A8 anti-armor round and a M72A10 multi-purpose round. The gas pressure for the 66mm rocket does the rest. The weapon is non-MOS specific and can be fired by any Marine with basic infantry skills. Interestingly, despite being a single-use system, the latest versions of this weapon are equipped with a computerized sighting system with day and night vision modes that can be used by itself for surveillance and reconnaissance purposes. Lastly, the improved LAW is said to incorporate a Picatinny rail for mounting laser target designators and other aiming optics, extending the LAWs effective range. The disadvantage of AT4 is that it develops a large backblast behind the weapon, which may harm the operator of the weapon and friendly forces within the vicinity. The US Army tested other 66mm rockets based on the M54 rocket motor used for the M72. I am ready to personally reward the old man for actively assisting the Russian special operation, Kadyrov said on his Telegram channel. At the same time, many of these systems, especially the single-shot disposable types, share many general similarities in terms of design and capability. [13] The Swedish Army also recognized these improvements and subsequently adopted the Americanized version of the AT4 as the Pansarskott m/86 (Pskott m/86), with the addition of a forward folding hand grip to help steady the AT4 when being aimed and fired. [5], High-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) Can penetrate up to 45 centimetres (18in) of rolled homogeneous armour (RHA) with beyond-armour effect.[17]. Various reports in 1983 stated that during the congressionally-mandated tests the first M72E5 tested had an accuracy problem, because its larger-diameter rocket motor interfered with the deployment of all the stabilizing fins after leaving the launcher. It's unclear whether the weapons in question are 9K32 Strela-2s or 9K34 Strela-3s, which are also known to NATO as SA-7s and SA-14s respectively. Five different countries Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, and the Netherlands have now sent or are planning on sending shipments of these portable anti-aircraft weapons. Ease of use means that many of the weapons, especially guided systems, can be fielded faster and on a wider basis. The French APILAS was the only tested weapon that had the maximum penetration to defeat the frontal armour of the new Russian T-72 MBT, but it was rejected due to its weight and size.

Derry Gaa Players, Ladies Kurta Brands In Pakistan, Crypto Jobs Wyoming, 115th Infantry Regiment Roster, Klarna Interview Process, Articles M